Six commitments. Every engagement.
Over ten years of working with site engineers, facility managers, sustainability teams, and project managers taught us the six things that go wrong with water and environmental consulting work. We've built Eko around making sure they don't.
Talk with Eko.
Free 30-minute project review. Reply within one business day. Fields marked * are required.
Fixed scope, fixed fee
Construction projects run on tight margins and timelines. Facility budgets are scrutinised quarterly. Every variation from your consultant comes out of those margins. We scope work properly up front, give you a fixed fee, and don't issue variations without your written sign-off. If we missed something at scoping stage, that's on us; not on your budget.
Work scheduled around your operational reality
The wrong time to do a site assessment is the morning your contractor needs the area cleared for earthworks. The wrong time to audit a building is mid-tenant-move-in. We plan field work around your operational sequence. When something has to happen at a specific time (a sampling round, a seasonal survey window, a cooling tower shutdown), we tell you that at the start, not the week before.
Recommendations that get implemented
Most environmental and water reports specify recommendations that look good on paper yet are near impossible to action. Because they are written by someone who has never had to implement them. Every action plan, control measure, and management protocol in our deliverables are pressure-tested for practical implementation. If a facility manager couldn't run it on a Monday morning, or a site supervisor couldn't build it on a Tuesday afternoon, with the team they've got, it doesn't go in the document. This isn't softer engineering. Realistic measures described clearly get implemented properly. Recommendations that aren't get ignored, which creates more problems, not less.
The right approach, assessed up front
The most expensive mistake in water and environmental work is committing to the wrong approach early. Lodging a NSW development application under the wrong instrument. Specifying an action plan before the audit is done. Designing a monitoring program before the site geology is understood. We assess the right approach in the first week of engagement, not after the spend has been committed.
Plain-English documentation
A Notice of Determination with 47 conditions of consent is not a compliance plan. A water audit report with 80 pages of background and no clear action priorities is not useful. A water management plan written for a regulator is not a plan a facility team can follow. Every Eko Engineering document gets translated into a working version — what needs to happen, when, by whom, against what trigger, reported to whom, in what format. Your team gets a working document, not a legal one in the format that works for you.
Site-ready summaries for the people doing the work
Site engineers and supervisors don't have time to read a 90-page Construction Environmental Management Plan. Facility managers don't have time to extract operational protocols from a 60-page water management plan. We produce A3 site cards and one-page operational summaries alongside the formal documents. This version is adapted to suit what the people responsible actually keep in front of them, not the version that sits on the principal's shelf.
Talk to us about your next project.
These six commitments appear in our engagement letters, not just on this page. Hold us to them.